Quick verification steps: 1) Inspect the interior label, zipper tape or molded base for a “Country of Origin” or “Assembled in” marking. 2) Compare the model number on the case with the brand’s official product page. 3) Ask the retailer for a photo of the manufacturing label or the invoice listing origin.
Material and component clues: Polycarbonate and ABS shells are commonly manufactured in Asia; aluminum shells and precision-milled frames are frequently finished in Europe. Wheel sets and zipper components often carry identifiable maker marks (for example, YKK on fasteners) that help trace component origin.
If you require verified origin for warranty or customs: Request a serial-numbered photo of the label or a factory certificate from the seller, register the product via the brand’s official support channel, and keep the invoice showing country of origin. If the seller cannot provide proof, prefer models that include explicit origin labeling in product listings.
Practical tip: When buying online, add a short request before purchase: “Please confirm and photograph the country-of-origin label for model [insert model number].” Save that exchange to simplify returns or customs enquiries.
Production Origins for This Travel Brand
Recommendation: prioritise items assembled in Vietnam for polycarbonate shells and in Italy for aluminium-cased models; confirm assembly country via the interior sewn tag, stamped frame code or official serial lookup before completing the purchase.
Verification checklist: 1) Inspect the sewn label inside the main compartment for a clear “Country of Assembly” line; 2) Check the metal frame or handle base for a stamped batch code and photo it; 3) Enter the product serial on the maker’s authentication page or contact customer support with the serial and order number; 4) Request close-up photos of seams, wheel housings and zipper pulls from the seller when country info is missing.
Quality patterns by construction: polycarbonate and ABS hard shells are commonly assembled in Southeast Asian plants (Vietnam, Thailand) with final QC stickers inside the case; aluminium and machined-metal designs are frequently finished in European workshops (Italy) where rivets, corner fittings and anodising are handled locally; soft-sided textile models often list China or Vietnam for assembly but use zippers and lining components sourced globally.
Component / Model | Typical Assembly Location | What to check on the product |
---|---|---|
Hard-shell polycarbonate | Vietnam, Thailand | Interior QC sticker, smooth shell seams, molded serial inside lid |
Aluminium-frame cases | Italy (final finishing) | Anodised finish evenness, stamped frame number, precision rivets |
Soft-sided textile models | China, Vietnam | Sewn label with country, stitched zipper stops, bonded lining |
Hardware (wheels, locks) | Varied – component suppliers in Asia/Europe | Branding on locks, dual-wheel bearings, visible supplier marks |
Purchase recommendations: buy from authorised dealers that list assembly country on the product page; retain invoice and serial for warranty activation; if longevity and metal craftsmanship matter most, prioritise the aluminium series finished in Italy; for lightweight hard-shell travel, favour models assembled in Vietnam with documented factory QC stickers.
Countries and factories that manufacture the brand’s suitcases
Primary production hubs are China, Vietnam and Taiwan: China – Guangdong province (Dongguan, Shenzhen) for hard-shell injection molding and final assembly; Vietnam – Binh Duong and Ho Chi Minh City for textile assembly, lining and zipper work; Taiwan – Taichung and Kaohsiung for wheel modules, handle mechanisms and precision components.
Typical factory types and what they handle
Injection-molding plants in Dongguan and Shenzhen handle polycarbonate/ABS shells and structural frames; contract assemblers in Binh Duong focus on fabrics, internal dividers and zipper installation; component specialists in Taichung supply bearings, telescopic handles and polyurethane wheels. Smaller subcontractors in Guangzhou and Ningbo supply rivets, locks and logo plates.
How to confirm the exact factory for a specific unit
Check the product tag for country of origin and batch/lot code, then request the factory name and address from customer support quoting that code. Verify using customs/import records (Harmonized System code entries) or ask for a manufacturer’s declaration or certificate of origin. For seller transparency, request the subcontractor name for components (shell, handle, wheels) if you need assembly-level verification.
Verify origin from labels, serial numbers, and product codes
Check the sewn interior tag, the stamped metal plate, and any QR/barcode immediately; if a serial or product code does not validate on the maker’s official lookup or via customer service, treat the item as unverifiable and request full documentation before paying.
Serial number decoding
Typical authentic serials: 6–14 characters, alphanumeric; common encodings include a facility prefix (2–4 letters), a production date block (YYMM or YYYYMM), and a sequential batch number. Example patterns: ABC2023070001 or MFG2307-1234. Steps: 1) Photograph the full code (clear, with surrounding stitching/plate). 2) Enter it into the brand’s online verification tool or send to support. 3) If a QR code is present, scan and confirm the returned URL belongs to the official domain. If the serial length, character set, or separators differ from advertised patterns, flag the unit as suspicious.
Label and product-code checklist
Compare these elements against official references: country of manufacture wording and ISO country codes, fiber-content/care symbols, consistent font and laser-etch depth on metal plates, and GS1/EAN/UPC barcodes. Use a barcode lookup to verify the GS1 company prefix–note the prefix identifies the brand’s registration, not the physical workshop. Examine holograms, heat-stamped seals, rivet finishes, and stitch counts at stress points; counterfeit items often show inconsistent stitches, poor edge finishing, or adhesive residue.
If codes fail verification: demand a photos of the original receipt from an authorized dealer, request a tax invoice with matching serial, or open a dispute with the payment provider. For additional accessories compatibility and mounting options, see best luggage rack for sportster.
Sourcing shells, fabrics, zippers and other hardware components
Require supplier documents and test results up front: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, MSDS for polymers, third‑party lab reports for impact strength (ASTM D256/Izod) and melt flow index (ASTM D1238), REACH/RoHS and GRS/OEKO‑TEX for textiles.
-
Shells (hard cases)
- Preferred materials: PC/ABS blend (polycarbonate content 20–40%), pure polycarbonate for high-impact lines, or ABS for budget lines. Target Izod/impact strength: 12–18 kJ/m² for PC/ABS; Vicat softening point >120°C for PC.
- Resin suppliers to request certificates from: SABIC, LG Chem, Mitsubishi Chemical, Chi Mei. Ask for resin grade, MFI (target 8–18 g/10min), and lot traceability.
- Manufacturing notes: injection presses 1000–3000 ton for full shells; recommend AMBs for consistent cavity pressure. Specify ultrasonic welding and structural ribbing patterns; require production process control plans and cavity monitoring logs.
- Finish and plating: PVD or electroplated trims – require salt spray test ≥96 hours (ASTM B117) and plating thickness reports (Ni 5–8 µm, Cr 0.2–0.6 µm).
- Supplier checklist: part drawings, dimensional PP sample, tool trial report, resin batch number, shrinkage data, and drop‑test sample report (ISTA 3A or equivalent).
-
Exterior fabrics
- Common choices: 1000D Cordura/ballistic nylon for abrasion resistance, 1680D polyester for heavy-duty items, 420–600D ripstop polyester for lighter models. Specify denier and yarn construction.
- Waterproofing and coatings: PU coating 2–3 g/m² or higher; hydrostatic head target ≥3000 mm; DWR finish C0/C6 alternatives – request AATCC 22 and ISO 811 test reports.
- Recycled options: request GRS certification and supplier REPREVE/Unifi documentation if using rPET yarns; ask for % recycled content by weight.
- Seam and thread: polyester bonded thread Tex 40–70; seam strength target >200 N per stitch (ASTM D1683). Specify seam sealing method for high‑exposure panels.
-
Linings and padding
- Lining fabric: 190–210T polyester taffeta with PE coating for water resistance; specify weight g/m² and abrasion cycles (Martindale ≥10,000 cycles for premium).
- Foam inserts: EPE or EVA for shock absorption; density and compression set data required. Attach MSDS and thermal stability info.
-
Zippers and sliders
- Preferred manufacturers: YKK (Vislon/Excella), Raccagni (Italy) for premium metal, SBS or IDEAL for alternatives. Specify coil (nylon), molded (Vislon), or metal teeth per SKU.
- Material specs: delrin/polyacetal teeth or brass/metal; slider die‑cast zinc with corrosion plating or PVD for wear resistance. Request pull‑force test and cycle life (>10,000 cycles for premium).
- Security options: integrated TSA‑approved locks from certified suppliers; request Travel Sentry ID approval documentation and lock serial traceability.
- Quality metrics: zipper pull force, teeth misalignment tolerance, slider corrosion salt spray ≥48–96 hours depending on spec.
-
Handles, frames and telescoping systems
- Telescopic tubes: extruded 6000‑series aluminum (6061/6063), wall thickness per design; anodize 8–20 µm or hard‑anodize option. Require tensile and dimensional tolerances.
- Mechanisms: 3‑position locking with stainless springs and die‑cast zinc housings; request cycle test (20,000+ actuations) and push‑force data (N).
- Frame rivets and fasteners: stainless steel A2/A4 or plated steel per corrosion spec; torque and shear test reports required.
-
Wheels, bearings and axles
- Wheel material: thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) with Shore hardness 85–98A for balance of roll and durability; wheel cores reinforced with glass‑filled nylon if needed.
- Bearings: precision ABEC‑5 or better, stainless steel 608/Z or NSK/NTN branded options. Require bearing lubrication spec and tolerance reports.
- Performance tests: continuous roll test (km), noise level dB, axle shear test and environmental corrosion (salt spray).
-
Small hardware: buckles, D‑rings, rivets, grommets
- Material choices: zinc die‑cast with PVD or chrome, stainless steel for marine applications, acetal for lightweight buckles. Ask for plating thickness, adhesion and salt spray data.
- Webbing and straps: polyester or nylon webbing rated by tensile strength (target >1,500–3,000 N depending on position). Request woven sample and pull test report.
- Hardware suppliers: request full material composition, RoHS compliance, and batch traceability.
Quality control and verification
- Request full material traceability: resin lot numbers, fabric dye lot, zipper batch and hardware batch documented on packing list and certificate of conformity.
- Specify acceptance levels: AQL 2.5 for major defects, AQL 4.0 for minor; include checklist items for cosmetic, dimensional, functional and packing inspection.
- Insist on pre‑production samples (PP), production verification samples (PVS) and final random testing by an accredited lab for impact, drop (ISTA 3A) and environmental tests.
- Include contractual performance clauses: nonconforming lots to be held, rework limits, and right to audit supplier facilities and subcontractors.
Practical procurement tips
- Ask suppliers for specific test reports rather than generic certificates; compare numerical values (MFI, Izod, hydrostatic head, salt spray hours).
- Keep a preferred‑supplier list with approved sample sets, photographed tooling status, and signed production control plans.
- Use batch numbering on critical parts (shell halves, zippers, locks) so failed lots can be isolated quickly.
- Schedule random on‑site inspections during molding, zipper installation and final assembly stages; include functional checks: handle locking, spinner torque, zipper operation under load.
Quality checks and performance tests carried out at manufacturing sites
Require documented incoming-material inspection (IQC) with AQL 2.5 sampling for critical components and immediate quarantine for batches with ≥2% critical defects.
Incoming and in-line controls
- Material certificates and batch traceability for shells, fabrics, zippers, wheels and hardware; check tensile, thickness and coating values against spec sheets before production.
- First Article Inspection (FAI) on initial run: dimensional check, stitch counts, seam allowance, zipper alignment and handle fit; FAI report retained with photos.
- In-process quality control (IPQC): hourly visual checks, torque checks on wheel mounts, spot tensile tests on seams and random weight/volume checks to verify capacity tolerances.
- Statistical Process Control (SPC) for critical stations (welding, rivet press, wheel assembly) with control charts and corrective-action logs.
End-of-line and laboratory performance tests
- Drop and impact testing: protocol using ISTA 3A/1A-style methods – multiple orientation drops from 1.0–1.5 m and corner impacts; inspect for shell cracks, frame deformation and broken mounts.
- Wheel endurance: wheel dynamometer or track test delivering 50–150 km equivalent or 10,000–30,000 rotation cycles to detect bearing wear, axle loosening and tread degradation.
- Handle and pull tests: static pull at 200–400 N for 30–60 seconds and 5,000–10,000 extend/retract cycles for telescopic systems; verify locking detents and return springs.
- Zipper fatigue and seal tests: 10,000–20,000 open/close cycles on main zippers; seal integrity and slider retention checks under lateral load of 50–100 N.
- Seam and stitch strength: tensile tests to 100–300 N per seam segment and visual inspection for skipped stitches; destructive tear propagation tests on critical seams.
- Abrasion and surface wear: Martindale or Taber abrasion 10,000–50,000 cycles for fabric linings and external coatings; evaluate colorfastness and pilling.
- Compression and stacking: static compression test with 200–500 kg load for 10 minutes to assess shell creep, latch deformation and wheel compression.
- Environmental conditioning: temperature cycling −30°C to +70°C and humidity cycles to reveal material embrittlement, adhesive delamination and seal failures.
- Salt spray and corrosion: ASTM B117 salt fog exposure 24–96 hours for metal hardware; check plating adhesion, corrosion pits and lock function.
- Water resistance: hydrostatic head or IPX spray tests for fabrics and seams; for soft-sided pieces target 1,000–5,000 mm water column depending on product class.
- Weight and dimensional verification: batch weigh and measure against specified tolerances; cabin-size pieces tested for strict airline dimension limits.
- Electrical/lock testing (if applicable): TSA lock actuation cycles, battery enclosure tests and short-circuit/protection verifications for integrated electronics.
Documentation and acceptance criteria: test reports must reference the applied standard (ISTA, ISO 2859-1, ASTM series), include raw data, photos/video of failures, corrective-action records and retained sample units per lot (minimum 1 per 500 units).
- Buyer checklist to request from the manufacturer: IQC logs, FAI report, SPC charts, full lab test reports, salt-spray and wheel-test certificates, and evidence of retained samples for third-party verification.
Which labor standards, audits and certifications apply at production locations
Require current third‑party social compliance reports (SMETA, Amfori BSCI or SA8000) plus ISO 9001/14001/45001 certificates and evidence of corrective action before confirming orders.
Primary social standards commonly accepted by global brands: SMETA (Sedex Members Ethical Trade Audit), Amfori BSCI, SA8000. Supplementary schemes used for garment/soft‑goods supply chains include WRAP and membership in Fair Wear Foundation for worker‑voice programs.
Management and risk controls at site level are typically validated through ISO systems: ISO 9001 (quality management), ISO 14001 (environmental management) and ISO 45001 (occupational health & safety; replaces OHSAS 18001). Verify certificate numbers, issue/expiry dates and certification body registers (SGS, Bureau Veritas, TÜV, Intertek, UL).
Chemical and material safety certifications to request for components: OEKO‑TEX for textiles, GRS/RCS for recycled content, REACH compliance and test reports for restricted substances, plus region‑specific declarations such as California Proposition 65 and US CPSIA where relevant. Ask for lab test reports with methods and limits (ISO, EN or ASTM references).
Audit scope and methodology to insist on: announced vs unannounced option, worker interviews with a representative sample (typically 10–15% or at least 10 employees), payroll and timecard verification, HR file checks, payroll tax/social insurance reconciliation, H&S walkthrough including fire exits/PPE, and supplier management of subcontractors. Require photographic evidence and factory floor maps when safety issues are flagged.
Independent auditors to expect on valid reports: SGS, Intertek, Bureau Veritas, TÜV Rheinland or accredited local bodies. Reject self‑assessments unless supplemented by recent third‑party verification. Confirm auditor name, accreditation and whether the report is a surveillance or full audit.
Contract clauses to include in purchase agreements: right to conduct unannounced audits, requirement to disclose all subcontractors, mandatory corrective action plans with specific deadlines (typical severity timelines: immediate for critical; 30–90 days for major), worker grievance mechanism details, written employment contracts in local language, and commitment to a living‑wage roadmap (reference Anker methodology or Global Living Wage Coalition benchmarks).
Red flags to treat as automatic escalation: audit older than 12 months for medium‑risk sites (≤6 months for high‑risk), lack of payroll or social insurance records, refusal of worker interviews, repeated open corrective actions, certificates that cannot be verified on the certifier’s portal, and auditor conflicts of interest. Require follow‑up verification evidence and photographic documentation before resuming production.
Practical verification steps: request full audit report PDF, CAP with closure evidence, certificate numbers and certifier web links, recent payroll snapshots (masked personally identifiable data), and contact for the audit firm to confirm authenticity. For high‑value runs, commission an independent follow‑up or short‑scope audit within 90 days of initial report.